Response from Parliament re: The North American Union
August 25, 2007
In case you were wondering what the response of a lying member of parliament looks like, you can see it below. This is the follow up to my earlier post "Letter to Parliament". In my opinion, he is a liar and a traitor who we will undoubtedly be put on trial, convicted and imprisoned in the coming decade or so.
Notice the condescending attitude of the obvious form letter that assumed I am dumbed down idiot of the general public who could not have possibly read the documents for myself. By the way I have read it as I stated in my original letter. More than that I have read a number of document pertaining to the history of the creation of the European Union which are very instructive in the current circumstance since the same pattern is being followed for the Americas.
And you have to love the way he says the agreement "outlines an agenda for cooperation among the three countries, while respecting the sovereignty, culture, and laws of each". Hmmm... agenda for cooperation - what does that mean exactly - who's agenda and for what purpose. Hmmm... respects the sovereignty rather than preserves it. Hmmm... he also states there are no plans for a "North America wide union" but he does NOT state that it is off the table... maybe he means no plans today but they will conveniently change when the US economy enters the final stages of its currency meltdown in the next 2-3 years. Or more likely it will be a defacto union where we are integrated so tightly in all aspects but retain our sovereignty in name only and are ruled by the same group of corporate chief executives who are making it happen.
He then goes on to detail pretty much the integration of every major area that a society needs to control in order to guide its own destiny. And that doesn't even account for even a fraction of the 300 points of the SPP agreement. As all arrogant lying politicians, he assumes we are all a bunch of fools who cannot see through the socially engineered construct that's been created for us. Well I have news for you Gary, I have read very broadly and I see very well. Your consideration of me as one of the profane is a major miscalculation that will come back to haunt you down the road. In fact, I think I'll head down to his office in the next few weeks and tell him that myself, assuming he has the guts to even talk to one of his constituents.
June 29, 2007
Mr. Guy Selzler
506-3252 Glasgow Avenue
Victoria, BC V8X 1M2
Dear Mr. Selzler:
RE: SECURITY AND PROSPERITY PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH AMERICA
Thank you for writing regarding your concerns with the Security and Prosperity
Partnership of North America (SPP).
I welcome the opportunity to clarify matters.
The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North American (SPP) was launched in 2005
to improve the safety and enhance the prosperity of Canadian, United States and
Mexican citizens. This partnership promotes ways for the three countries to work
together in areas such as national security, transportation, the environment and public
health.
I should emphasize that the SPP outlines an agenda for cooperation among the three
countries, while respecting the sovereignty, culture, and laws of each. Although the
initiatives are grounded in the common interests of all North Americans, they preserve
the values of the three partners. There are no plans for the creation of a North
America-wide union. Rather, the SPP represents an opportunity for the governments of
Canada, the United States and Mexico to discuss common goals and identify ways for
each nation to achieve greater security, enhance prosperity and improve the quality of
life of North Americans.
Initiatives launched under the SPP include a series of cooperative, practical and
concrete measures aimed at a wide range of goals, including:
- Maintaining industrial competitiveness by increasing access to markets within
North America, facilitating transactions and the movement of goods and people
across borders and expanding use of B-commerce.
- Creating a sustainable energy economy by strengthening energy efficiency
standards, promoting regulatory cooperation, and encouraging research and
innovation in emerging energy technologies.
- Protecting the environment through regulatory cooperation, standards and
programs.
- Enhancing the capacity to protect the health of citizens against intentional and
naturally occurring threats to public health, for example by advancing cooperation
for pandemic planning.
- Securing North America through integrated or common approaches aimed at
facilitating the movement of legitimate trade and travel using road, rail, marine or
air transportation systems through secure border entry points, reducing crime and
the entry of contraband products, illegal immigrants, criminals and terrorists.
- Reducing risks related to major emergencies by collaborating on emergency
management issues ranging from emergency planning to joint disaster simulations.
For more details you may wish to consult the Canadian government's web site for the
Security and Prosperity Partnership: http://www.spp-psp.gc.ca. The Prime Minister's
Office web site also has details regarding the March 31, 2006 leaders' meeting in
Cancun, Mexico.
I hope that this clarification will help to allay your concerns.
Yours sincerely,
Gary Lunn, PC, MP
GL/ah
Image of Letter Page 1
Image of Letter Page 2