Microchipped: You Will Be Controlled
May 19, 2007
The media campaign to convince us all to take a microchip has been moved to the next phase and to no one's surprise the first salvo is being fired in the UK Police State. Read the Article at the Times Online:
Would an implanted chip help to keep my child safe?
Don't be fooled, an implanted chip will not make children safer. It will give parents
a false sense of security and lax in their parental supervision. And it will likely
cause parents to not educate their children about possible dangers and what to do.
This article is really a PR exercise to get the population used to the idea and
to eventually accept a chip implant years or even decades from now.
A good tool to try and understand how the adoption of this technology is unfolding,
and is likely to unfold in the future, is to look at the Technology Adoption Lifecycle popularized by the book Crossing the Chasm.
Technology Adoption Lifecycle
|
Innovators (I) |
The enthusiasts who like technology for its own sake. |
|
Early Adopters (EA) |
Those who have the vision to adopt an emerging technology to an opportunity that
is important to them. |
|
The Chasm (C) |
Time gap in technology adoption, which is between the early adoptors and the pragmatists. |
Pragmatists (P)
Early Majority |
Early majority pragmatists are the solid citizens who do not like to take the risks
of pioneering, but are ready to see the advantages of tested technologies. They
are the begining of a mass market. |
Pragmatists (P)
LateMajority |
Late majority pragmatists, who represent about one-third of available customers,
disklike discontinuous innovations and believe in tradition rather than progress.
They buy high-technology products reluctantly and do not expect to like them. |
|
Traditionalists (T) |
Traditionalists (laggards) do not engage with high technology products - except
to block them. They perform the valuable service of pointing out regularly the discrepancies
between the day-to-day reality of the product and the claims made for it. |
Application to Implantable Microchips
So, let's take a look at how this applies to implantable microchips.
1. First, we saw this technology unveiled and shown to be cutting edge. We saw teenage
hipster innovators and even whole families getting themselves implanted. And the
press beat the drum to drive home the message that you're behind the times if you
don't want one too.
2. Then we saw early adopters like the rich private clubs doing it. This was followed
closely by claims the Mexican government leaders were being implanted and hospitals
were adopting it to track patients. Never mind that some of these reports were completely
false. The message is clear, the technology is being adopted and is all but inevitable
(it's not).
3. Currently, the implantable chip has entered the Chasm and will either cross or
die so the theory goes. As the picture shows, a great number of products die in
the chasm and are never adopted. So, the story above when viewed in this context
can be seen as an attempt by the globalists to cross the chasm by launching a campaign
of fear and worry among the population to make them want to rush out and get it.
The message is you're children are at extreme risk and this is the only way to protect
them. This stage will take years but with enough time and effective use of the media,
they will seek to create an understanding that the chip is desireable, beneficial
and a boon to society.
Continuous Onslaught
Of course, the RFID technology behind this is on its own lifecycle and has already
gone into the early majority stage for other applications like inventory and animal
tracking. This is a bad thing, since the technology will not die and will persist
in other uses and be ready for a series of media assaults on us to convince us its
a good thing. The assault will continue year after year. And if there is a major
terror attack orchestrated by the government against its own people like a nuclear
weapon, look out, this technology will be fast tracked and mandated by the government
after martial law is declared.
The Big Picture
Whenever we analyze a particular issue, its important to place it context with other
events taking place in our society. So here are some of them:
- The war on terror, and the climate of fear it creates, plays into the false need
for increased security.
- The march toward using biometrics and RFID in driver's license which is being sold
in the name of security.
- The drive towards a cashless society by 2010 as said by the head of VISA last year.
- Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that never end and establish a permanent climate of
fear.
- The relentless surrender of personal rights and freedoms in the name of security
through the passage of draconion anti-terrorist legislation.
- Attempts to remove internet neutrality and allow corporations to take over the internet
- The increasing use of surveillance cameras everywhere but the worst is currently
the UK with over 5 million cameras.
OK, there is more but this is enough to see a pattern start to emerge. When we view
implantable microchips in the current context, we can only come to one conclusion
- this is just one of many tools being advanced to establish greater and greater
state/corporate control over us. Of all these tools, the implantable chip is the
worst.
POLICE STATE
Pure and simple the implantable chip has nothing to do with safety and everything
to do with state control over our lives. If the elite manage to convince the majority
of people its good and necessary, it is over. You will be living as a slave in a
police state where your every move is tracked and monitored. Think of China only
100 times worse.